From Floyd Baker (eba ker @ buff alot ango. com):
Re: A human bias against creativity is hindering science, research claims (Dec. 12): I agree totally... As does Nietzsche with him referring to humanity's 'herd' instinct... And my calling it the 'hive' instinct...
I experience it all the time... lol
In fact... If anyone there would like to hear something creative. . , I will be happy to send it to you... It is my well banged out theory that may be that of SR 'Everything'... That which Einstein could not work out...
So right off the bat I may have shot myself in the foot... By making such a claim. . ? :)
But I do use extreme logic. . . And only proven or well accepted points to explain and prove my theory. . . It gives all the answers that I have put to it and I see no loose ends.
I have simply replaced the imagined factor of time with gravity, that which is said to *cause* time dilation in the first place... , in a way that can be used to measure the true aspects of the cosmos... The results of which are mind boggling. . .
Removing time instantly does away with decades of misdirection and it's projections into a fantasy world.
No more time travel, time dilation, time folding, worm holes, multiple universes, holograms from
dark holes. , and anything else that has come from letting time run loose in the calculations. .
It may even come to proving the universe is static. . .
Not increasingly expanding... Not expanding at all.
I see the potential for it. . , but don't know yet if there is 'proven' ability for that to be the case... I can't do it all, eh? :)
It explains the concept of light always being seen as a constant speed no matter what amount of 'time dilation' one might be undergoing...
It explains all the 'time' related paradox's that I have run it against. . .
I joke that it may be what the Myan's were referring to in their prediction of TEOTWAWKI. .
Modifying it slightly to read The End Of The Universe As We Know It... because they just didn't understand how big it was...
Einstein was wrong. Time is not a fourth dimension...
I think that's pretty creative... :)
Would there be an interest in putting this 'theory' of mine forth. . ? Once you see that it holds water of course. . ?
Many thanks
I experience it all the time... lol
In fact... If anyone there would like to hear something creative. . , I will be happy to send it to you... It is my well banged out theory that may be that of SR 'Everything'... That which Einstein could not work out...
So right off the bat I may have shot myself in the foot... By making such a claim. . ? :)
But I do use extreme logic. . . And only proven or well accepted points to explain and prove my theory. . . It gives all the answers that I have put to it and I see no loose ends.
I have simply replaced the imagined factor of time with gravity, that which is said to *cause* time dilation in the first place... , in a way that can be used to measure the true aspects of the cosmos... The results of which are mind boggling. . .
Removing time instantly does away with decades of misdirection and it's projections into a fantasy world.
No more time travel, time dilation, time folding, worm holes, multiple universes, holograms from
dark holes. , and anything else that has come from letting time run loose in the calculations. .
It may even come to proving the universe is static. . .
Not increasingly expanding... Not expanding at all.
I see the potential for it. . , but don't know yet if there is 'proven' ability for that to be the case... I can't do it all, eh? :)
It explains the concept of light always being seen as a constant speed no matter what amount of 'time dilation' one might be undergoing...
It explains all the 'time' related paradox's that I have run it against. . .
I joke that it may be what the Myan's were referring to in their prediction of TEOTWAWKI. .
Modifying it slightly to read The End Of The Universe As We Know It... because they just didn't understand how big it was...
Einstein was wrong. Time is not a fourth dimension...
I think that's pretty creative... :)
Would there be an interest in putting this 'theory' of mine forth. . ? Once you see that it holds water of course. . ?
Many thanks
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home